Alarming Consequences of Vaccinating Children

By:  Andreas Moritz
Posted:  December 28, 2011 — updated 2023

Almost every day I receive anxious questions from parents who are concerned about their vaccinated children’s welfare. Many of them share the negative experiences their kids had with vaccines, and that’s everything what’s listed as side effects on the web sites of vaccine makers and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

For example, the CDC admits that several severe problems have been reported following MMR vaccine, and might also happen after MMRV. These include severe allergic reactions, and problems such as deafness, long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, permanent brain damage. However, the CDC is quick to add: “Because these problems occur so rarely, we can’t be sure whether they are caused by the vaccine or not.”

The problem with all this is that these vaccine injuries are not so rare as the CDC wants parents to know. In fact, they are extremely common. The Federal Drug Administration (FDA), World Health Organization (WHO), and other health agencies have all stated repeatedly that vaccine side effects are grossly underreported. According to the FDA, doctors only report between 1 and 10 percent of serious side effects.

What’s worse, many vaccine side-effects don’t occur before one or several months after vaccination. So when a child develops asthma, constant seizures or a severe allergy, the doctor will treat these as separate diseases and not list as them as vaccine-injuries. The common assumption (not a proven fact) is that vaccine side-effects occur only during the first few days following vaccination. It is believed there are no long-term side-effects. It’s only a belief, though, because long-term vaccine safety studies were never permitted to prove or disprove this assumption.

This is what confuses the issue even further: Although the rate of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the highest in countries where children receive the most vaccines, the medical industry claims that SIDS is unexplainable. SIDS is the leading cause of death among infants 1 month to 1 year old, and the official line is: “The cause of death cannot be explained.” In the field of law, there is something called ‘circumstantial evidence’, and it applies to the field of medicine just as much. Healthy children don’t just die suddenly without a reason.

The medical industry denies that vaccines could have anything to do with being the biggest baby killers. However, this doesn’t make the circumstantial evidence go away. For one thing, SIDS almost never occurs in non-vaccinated children. And why do vaccinated children have 120% more Asthma, 317% more ADHD, 185% more Neurologic disorders, and 146% more Autism than those not vaccinated? How much circumstantial evidence do we need to at least raise this important question: What is the main difference between a vaccinated and a non-vaccinated one year old?

Well, in the United States a child receives 36 vaccinations before age 5, and 1 child in 91 develops autism. Eight deaths per 1000 in children below 5 years of age are due to vaccinations. In comparison, in Iceland a child receives 11 vaccine shots while only 1 child in 11,000 develops autism, and only 4 children per 1000 die as a result of being vaccinated.

Of course, the above number of vaccine-linked deaths doesn’t include the number of deaths from SIDS, which is the most common cause of death among infants. If 8 out of 1000 vaccinated children die because of anaphylactic shock (anaphylaxis) right after they receive a vaccine, is it so far-fetched to assume that an infant could eventually succumb to the immune-destructive effects of vaccine chemicals a month or even a year later, especially if additional vaccines are administered between their first and ‘final’ shot?

Until recently, the very long-term side-effects of vaccines were unknown, but a new analysis of 151 older scientific studies has demonstrated that suppressing the primary immune response through vaccination during childhood significantly increases the risk of developing cancer later in life. So if childhood vaccination can lead to cancer 30 years later, what else can it do that hasn’t been studied yet?

The government health agencies claim that severe vaccine side effects are very rare, but how do they know that when, because of ‘ethical’ reasons, they prohibit any double blind control study comparing vaccinated children with non-vaccinated children? As astounding as it is in this day and age, to this day, there are no long-term, double-blind vaccine safety studies. So how can the CDC claim vaccines are safe when they have never undergone such safety scrutiny? Or would they even want to know?

How can a conscientious doctor make the determination that an infant who receives his first vaccine shot on the day of his birth (Hep B) and dies a month later for no apparent reason didn’t die from the long-term effects of the vaccine? She cannot even make such an assumption because the government disallows clinical vaccine safety studies. According to CDC, the vaccine couldn’t possibly kill a child so many days after inoculation, because “vaccines are safe” (in the absence of any research to actually prove that).

Any layperson would understand that injecting vaccine ingredients such as aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, anti-freeze agents, nail polish removers, DNA fragments from animals, antibiotics and dozens of other, equally toxic, carcinogenic chemicals into an infant’s body could actually poison it and permanently damage or destroy the immune system, as well as the brain and digestive system, especially if the child was born prematurely, was delivered by Caesarian section, or wasn’t breastfed (all factors that weaken the immune system).

Pumping poisons into helpless infants’ bodies

30-odd jabs in the first 18 months of life! That’s how many times the average American infant gets vaccinated. Children in the United Kingdom are slightly better off. They get vaccinated only 25 times at this tender age. And to make sure you’re well and truly on the vaccination trail early enough, it is mandatory for babies to get 9 or more different antigens (disease-causing substances) pumped into their immature immune systems almost immediately after birth, some of them cocktails of more than one vaccine.

The best part for Big Pharma is that most of these vaccinations are backed by law. Children who are not vaccinated as per the CDC’s schedule cannot enter or stay within the formal education system. As if this arm-twisting were not enough, entire populations the world over are brainwashed into believing that they or their children will contract life-threatening diseases if they do not get vaccinated. And don’t we all want the best for our children?

For many decades, leading scientists and doctors have vehemently promoted the idea that immunization of children is necessary to protect them from contracting diseases such as diphtheria, smallpox, polio, cholera, typhoid and malaria. Yet evidence is mounting, showing that immunization may not only be unnecessary but even harmful. Pouring deadly chemicals into a lake doesn’t make it immune to pollutants. Likewise, injecting the live poisons contained in vaccines into the bloodstream of children hardly gives future generations a chance to lead truly healthy lives.

Fallacy and Fallout

Ever since Louis Pasteur proposed his erroneous germ theory of disease, the scientific establishment has linked a variety of bacteria, viruses and other pathogens to life-threatening illnesses against which pharmaceutical companies have devised an armor of protection in their little vials.

The problem is that despite their claims of success, certain vaccines have been consistently linked to specific symptoms and syndromes, some of which continue to baffle scientists and doctors even today. Among the various diseases that have been correlated to vaccines are chronic fatigue syndrome, autoimmune disorders, learning disabilities, encephalitis, growth inhibition, developmental disorders and hyperactivity.

Some of these issues, such as learning disabilities, were once dismissed as simple problems of growing up. Medical researchers now recognize them as forms of encephalitis (inflammatory disease of the brain). Here’s a shocking statistic: More than 20 percent of American children – 1 out of 5 – suffer from these or related problems.

There is a mounting body of scientific research which shows that chronic diseases such as encephalitis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, leukemia and other forms of cancer and even HIV may be provoked by vaccines administered in infancy.

For instance, rheumatoid arthritis, an inflammatory disease of the joints, was once an affliction of the elderly. Now, this crippling disease is widely prevalent among younger people and has been consistently associated with measles and rubella vaccinations.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a serious disease that leads to paralysis, is another syndrome which has been consistently associated with immunizations against measles, diphtheria, influenza, tetanus and the oral polio vaccine. This is hardly surprising when one considers the high toxicity of the vaccines. It is well-known that children whose immune systems are already weak experience more serious complications than those whose constitution and immune systems are much stronger.

Buying Into Myths

It is nearly impossible to estimate the damage and suffering that has been created and that will occur in future as a result of inadequate information about the dangers of modern immunization programs. Parents want to do what is best for their children and they carry a heavy burden of responsibility to keep them healthy and safe. Misinformation can create considerable conflict in parents because they don’t want to neglect their children’s health or cause them any harm.

Vaccine proponents argue that their chemical formulations have not just saved lives; they have also prevented epidemics and all but wiped out some deadly diseases from the face of the earth! This is nothing but a myth. The truth is that the four leading childhood killer diseases – scarlet fever, pertussis or whooping cough, diphtheria and measles – had already declined by more than 90 percent before vaccines against these diseases were introduced! The reason these diseases vanished was that living conditions such as hygiene, sanitation and standards of living had improved significantly and people increasingly had access to healthy food. According to the CDC, clean drinking water is more effective in preventing infectious diseases than vaccines. That sums up the value of vaccination.

You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyper link back to the post.