References and data for supporting the Liver Flush
Hi, this is another question from Dave and it relates to a passage taken from my book “THE AMAZING LIVER AND GALL BLADDER FLUSH” and it says there, the body produces amino acids and proteins from the nitrogen, carbon, oxygen and hydrogen molecules contained in the air and he says that that statement goes against well established scientific knowledge.
And I tend to disagree with you in the respect that certainly this is not a statement that can be backed by scientific research, but then I do not rely very much on scientific research for the things that I have come to realize and understand to be correct. Most of the things that I have done, for example the amazing liver and gall bladder, that is certainly not based on any scientific research, that is standing out, that is just promoting the idea that we have a lot of stones in the bile ducts of the liver. In fact, if you ask any doctor he will say this is hogwash, there is no truth to it.
You have to dig deeper and find the actual statements that were made by John Hopkins University and many other Universities, that there are these intra hepatic gallstones in the bile ducts of the liver but most doctors, they do not take it seriously, in fact they do not even know about it. There are other things that are known in science but they are not applied. There are things that are backed by scientific research and they are completely wrong where the science has never actually proven to be right.
The New England Journal of Medicine once wrote an article based on scientific research stating that eighty five to ninety five percent of everything that the medical system, hospitals and doctors practice in their practices, is actually not backed by scientific research. So there is not much science in science, in other words, and I have learnt to rather rely on observation, what I have discovered through my own experiences on myself and on hundreds and thousands of people around the world and what I discovered is that, in fact, I have looked at many people who had no need for eating food, but there were bacteriums who never eat food.
And so when you think of that, where in the body is the body capable of producing proteins from nothing, and you have to, then you create this circumstantial evidence to show that in fact the body does not die in these cases when they do not eat anything. So where is the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen coming from, that are the constituents of proteins, when the person does not eat anything that contains these elements.
We know that carbohydrates consist of carbon, oxygen and hydrogen molecules. So carbohydrates, when ingested, can supply us with the sugars that we need in order to sustain ourselves. Then we have nitrogen in the air, we also have nitrogen in protein foods and so, if a person does not eat protein foods then he will somehow, according to science, would not be able to sustain himself because most or all the cells in the body are made of protein also where is the protein coming from?
Again going back to the question, how do breatharians survive? I have seen them live for several years without eating anything and I know one person, he is 100 years old and he had never eaten a thing in his life and he has other gifts and abilities, but that really does not matter in this respect. The main question is, why can people, without eating protein, live comfortably and healthily? Where are they manufacturing the proteins from? What are the ingredients? Where are these ingredients or components coming from?
In my own case, I stopped eating animal protein or any concentrated proteins when I was eighteen years old due to severe ailments and I had eaten too much protein, in fact I became protein deficient because I ate so much protein that I clogged out my intestines and the membranes, the mucus lining was so thick because it tried to defend itself against these un-digestive proteins and so the body would not even digest and absorb any food properly because of overeating proteins.
So, there is a limit as to how much protein the body can ingest or digest without becoming ill and we now know according to research from the National Institute of Cancer which tested five hundred and fifty thousand Americans and found there was an increased risk of dying from regularly eating meat, chicken, and turkey, and other meat products… simply from eating meat.
So obviously there is something not quite right in the picture that science is delivering us. My concept that we are pretty much self sufficient when it come to protein needs to be proven. But there is no scientist who is ever going to attempt that because there is no money to be made of this. When you tell people that they do not need protein, you will have the food industry after you. So I am not making false claims, these claims are based on practical life experiences with many, many people, and with myself.
So the question still remains, and then if anyone could answer that, why when I do not eat any protein foods does my body still make proteins, and we know that every protein is composed of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen and since the air is supplying you with these particular substances and also atoms and also I get some through the food like carbon, oxygen and hydrogen in carbohydrates and vegetable, foods and grain foods, but certainly there is not enough nitrogen in these foods to maintain the functions and the changeover or turnover of cells in my body at the rate of thirty billion per day.
I suffer from zero protein deficiency. So that is reason enough for me to continue eating the way I am without eating any protein foods except some nuts and seeds here and there, occasionally some legumes and some avocado but that is about it, certainly not enough to create this massive amounts of proteins that we supposedly need in order to sustain ourselves.
So I hope that erases more questions in your mind and every person has to do whatever they need to do in order to feel good and be healthy and so, if eating meat makes you healthy then go for it, if eating vegetarian diet makes you healthier then go for that. I am not telling people what they should or should not eat, I am making recommendations based on my findings. I consider myself a scientist in the filed of natural medicine. I have studied mind-body medicine for many years. I am a doctor of ayurvedic medicine which is the oldest system of medicine, which by the way, also does not favor, never tells anyone, to eat concentrated proteins as found in meat, chicken, fish.
So for a science of that age, six / seven thousand years old, to have made conclusions… that is far more science to me than modern science which is heavily flawed and it has a track record of accuracy of about ten – fifteen percent, should we believe the studies that were done by the New England Journal of Medicine, the World Health Organization and the wing of congress, the American congress which clearly shows that there is not much science behind science.
——————————
You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyper link back to the web page