Vaccinating pets is dangerous
Hi, this is a face book question from Terry Ann and she is wondering what about these vaccine shots given to dogs every year, year after year…
And once again I am not in favor of giving vaccine shots to humans or animals alike. In neither case has it been proven that vaccines actually promote immunity in any significant way. On the other hand it has been shown that vaccines, through the cocktail of toxins they contain, actually suppress the immune systems of humans and of animals. There is no real good reason why we should vaccinate pets against anything because there is no proof that vaccinated pets are protected against the infectious diseases that they are supposed to protect them against. And there is not even any study to show that vaccines protect against illness in humans, there is absolutely no reason why it should be any different for animals, pets, dogs, cats and so on.
So I highly recommend to find ways, not to get these vaccines shots for the animals, because there is just zero evidence, scientific proof that vaccines have any significant value. The only beneficiaries of vaccines are the pet industry that includes the medical pet industry that will get a lot more sick animals, pets, and in their offices and clinics to treat them with the same sort of drugs, medications and surgery that is applied to humans when they get sick.
So it is a very big money-making scam, first vaccines for dogs and cats and other pets which will lower their immune system just like in humans, it suppresses the primary immune system, which is the only real immune system that we have, the secondary immune system is secondary, the secondary immune system consists of the production of antibodies and just injecting a substance into the blood of the animals to evoke antibody production, does not mean anything in terms of protecting the animal against an infectious agent, a pathogen.
Just like with the cases of mumps and measles and chicken pox and others that the people that are exposed to, those particular viruses or pathogens that have already been vaccinated are the first ones to, or the most likely, to contract that very same illness they are supposedly protected against through the vaccinations. Same thing with polio, we find just the recent study that came out of Pakistan and showed that seventy-eight percent of children that have previously deemed fully vaccinated up to four times with the polio vaccines, seventy percent of children that have polio were fully vaccinated. So that should tell us a lot, give us a lot of clues how vaccines really work. They suppress the immune system and make us more susceptible to the very same agents that we are supposedly protecting us against.
So I do not see there is any difference between humans and animals in that respect. Animals have lived on this planet long before us, they have learnt just like we have to defend themselves or protect themselves to live in an environment that is filled with bacteria and viruses, and they are living in harmony with them, their immune systems have evolved over millions of years and so have our immune systems evolved over millions of years to a point that we can live in harmony with what is in our immediate and far distant environment. We get exposed to certain germs, the immune system knows how to adapt to them, to evolve to a state that it can stay protected against the same pathogens for the rest of their lives whereas vaccines do not do that.
Just they couple of days ago the CDC, the center for disease control, have announced that the flu vaccines offer protection only for several months like two – three months and then they fade out, that means the entire suggestion that, once you have created antibodies to a particular pathogen that will leave you protected against that pathogen, that entire theory is being thrown out of the window by the very same statement that ‘well the vaccines last only for a couple of month and then you will have to become revaccinated in order to stay immune!’.
What kind of immunity is that, that is based on the production of antibodies, when the production of antibodies really does not do anything? The flu vaccines have a success rate of one percent to protect against the flu. There the placebo response is far, far more efficient than that, which can be up to thirty-forty percent, so one percent success rate really shows that there is almost zero protection from flu vaccine which is not any different in principle to compared with the other vaccines which are just useless, butthey all cause a suppression of the primary immune system. They only trigger the secondary immune response which consists of antibody production and, antibody production is, as we have seen with the flu vaccine, pretty useless to bestow permanent immunity to a particular pathogen.
Thank you
——————————
You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyper link back to the web page
